A Reader's Glossary

Agnipariksha

Agnipariksha means the ordeal by fire, the trial in which Sita walks into a burning pyre to prove her chastity after her rescue from Lanka. It is one of the most debated moments in the entire epic, read by different generations as anything from divine vindication to public spectacle.

Even if Rama “knew” she would survive the fire trial because of her divine purity, Sita did not know. She stood before the pyre facing the terrifying, physical reality of burning alive, crushed by the public humiliation delivered by the man she loved.

If the justice system requires an innocent victim to be psychologically broken and physically endangered just to prove a point to a crowd, then the system itself is warped.

---

Dandaka

The vast forest wilderness stretching across the Deccan plateau of central India. In Ramayana-era geography, Dandaka marked the boundary between the ordered, law-governed kingdoms of the north and the wilder territories of the south.

Raghav, Sita and Lux spent years of their forest exile here. It was also Arya-Raksha borderland — a contested space where both peoples lived, hunted and farmed.

Agastya’s instruction to Raghav to clear Dandaka of Rakshas is the event that sets the chain of consequences in motion. What Aryavarta called pacification, the Rakshas called something else.

---

Chitrakut

A hill and forest not far from Saket, the first stop of the exile before Raghav, Sita and Lux moved on toward Dandaka.

Sarama did not witness this period herself — her chronicle begins later, in Lanka — but she records what Sita told her afterward: that Chitrakut, not Saket, was the closest she came in those years to an ordinary life. No court. No crowd deciding what was true. Just the three of them and the work of surviving a season.

It was also here, by Sita’s own account, that word reached them of Dashrath’s death, and that Bharath came to ask his brother to return and take the throne. Raghav refused. Sarama records this without comment. She notes only that both decisions — the refusal, and the years that followed it — were made by men, for reasons the men considered sufficient, and that no one asked Sita whether she would have chosen differently.

---

Janasthana

A Raksha settlement in the Dandaka forest — the northernmost community of the Raksha people, and the most exposed to Arya expansion.

It is the site of the event that precedes everything in Travesty. On Agastya’s instruction, Raghav burned Janasthana and killed its entire population: fourteen thousand people. Aryavartan law framed this as the elimination of a threat. Sarama frames it differently.

When Janasthana burned, it was not only warriors who died.

Janasthana was not a military garrison. It was a community.

---

Videha

A kingdom in what is now northern Bihar and southern Nepal — prosperous, progressive and distinct in character from the Aryavartan heartland to its west.

Videha was Sita’s home. Her father Janaka was its king. The court at Mithila, Videha’s capital, was known across the subcontinent for its intellectual culture: open debate, philosophical inquiry, and — unusually for the era — a willingness to include women in matters of state.

This is the world that formed Sita. Ayodhya, by contrast, was a kingdom of order, hierarchy and duty. The distance between those two cultures is one of the quiet tensions running through the story.

Sita’s formal name, Vaidehi, means daughter of Videha.

---

Lanka

An island kingdom at the southern tip of the subcontinent, separated from the mainland by a narrow sea crossing. In most traditions it corresponds to present-day Sri Lanka, though the geography in Travesty is understood as mythic rather than cartographic.

Lanka under Ravan was a sophisticated maritime civilisation — wealthy from trade, culturally distinct from Aryavarta, and governed by Raksha law rather than Manu’s law. Its capital, Trikuta, sat at the intersection of sea routes connecting the subcontinent to distant lands.

The Rakshas of Lanka were not a uniform people. Fishermen, gardeners, merchants, temple singers and farmers made up the majority. Most carried no weapon.

Sarama’s chronicle is written here. She remembers it not as a kingdom of demons — the word raksha is often mistranslated — but as a place of ordinary life, interrupted by a war it did not choose.

She remembers the monsoon there too — the crossing to the mainland delayed by weather more than once, the war’s final weeks fought in rain that turned the ground under Trikuta’s walls to mud. It is not the detail the court chronicles bothered to keep. It is the one she kept.

---

Saket

Capital of Koshala and seat of the House of Raghu — the city Raghav returned to after fourteen years away, and the place where the second and final fire trial was staged in front of the full court.

Aryavartan chronicles remember Saket as a city of gardens, canals and temples, its order held up as proof that Manu’s law produces good government. Sarama, writing from outside that system, is less certain the order was ever as complete as the court liked to claim.

By the time Raghav, Sita and Lux reached its gates, the city had already decided what it believed happened at Lanka. The agnipariksha did not settle a private doubt. It performed a public one.

---

A Note on the Word Raksha

Modern translations of the Ramayana frequently render Rakshasa as demon or monster. This is also how it is used everyday in India today.

Example —

Every Rakshasa gets swollen with his ego. He thinks he is invincible, beyond every law. But sooner or later something or other will destroy him. ― (R.K. Narayan, The Man-Eater of Malgudi, 84)

For Sarama, this is a political and theological interpretation of the winning side, not a neutral translation.

In Travesty, Raksha is used instead of Rakshasa as an ethnic and cultural designation — a people with their own laws, customs, histories and moral codes. Sarama is Raksha. Vibhi is Raksha. The fourteen thousand who died at Janasthana were Raksha.

---

A Note on Duty and Its Uneven Weight

Travesty does not divide its suffering neatly along the line of gender, though it is tempting to read it that way.

The men of this chronicle carry duty as an outward performance: Raghav’s kingship, Lux’s loyalty, Bharath’s refusal of a throne he did not seek. Their grief tends to happen where no one is required to witness it — a brother’s guilt, a king’s private doubt, carried alone because carrying it publicly was never an option available to them either.

The women carry a different weight. Kaikeyi’s ambition is remembered as manipulation rather than statecraft, though it moved a kingdom. Urmila’s fourteen years alone in Saket, while Lux served his brother in exile, appear in almost no telling at all. Sita’s own account — what she actually said, at Janasthana and at the pyre — survives mainly because Sarama chose to write it down.

---

A Note on How This Was Remembered

Little of what happened in Travesty survives as written record from the time. Aryavartan court chronicles were kept by scribes loyal to the throne. Raksha communities such as Janasthana and Lanka kept their history mostly in memory and in song, their accounts passed hand to hand rather than committed to any single page.

Sarama’s chronicle sits closer to the second tradition than the first. She was not a court scribe. She wrote afterward, from testimony and her own memory, in the manner of the women who sang what the official record left out.

---

A Note on Names

Characters in Travesty carry multiple names, as was common in the oral traditions from which these stories come.

Name used in Travesty	Also known as	Note
Raghav	Ram, Rama, Raghavendra	Son of the Raghu line
Sita	Vaidehi, Janaki, Mythili	Named for Videha and Mithila
Lux	Lakshmana, Saumitra	Raghav’s younger brother
Vibhi	Vibhishana	Ravan’s brother; Sarama’s husband
Ravan	Ravana, Dashagriva	King of Lanka
Maruti	Hanuman	Leader of the Vanara forces

For Serious Readers who want to extend this

Leave a commment using “Annotate A Passage” option under Dear Reader.